UNIT OPERATIONS IN FOOD PROCESSING
Contents > Drying > Air Drying Print   this page

Home
Contents
About the book
Introduction
Material and energy
balances

Fluid-flow theory
Fluid-flow applications
Heat-transfer theory
Heat-transfer
applications

Drying
Evaporation
Contact-equilibrium
separation processes

Mechanical
separations

Size reduction
Mixing
Appendices
Index to Figures
Index to Examples
References
Bibliography
Useful links
Feedback (email link)

CHAPTER 7
DRYING
(cont'd)

AIR DRYING


Calculation of Constant Drying Rates
Falling Rate Drying
Calculation of Drying Times


In air drying, the rate of removal of water depends on the conditions of the air, the properties of the food and the design of the dryer.

Moisture can be held in varying degrees of bonding. Formerly, it was considered that water in a food came into one or other of two categories, free water or bound water. This now appears to be an oversimplification and such clear demarcations are no longer considered useful. Water is held by forces whose intensity ranges from the very weak forces retaining surface moisture to very strong chemical bonds.
In drying, it is expected that the water that is loosely held will be removed most easily. Thus it would be expected that drying rates would decrease as moisture content decreases, with the remaining water being bound more and more strongly as its quantity decreases.


In many cases, a substantial part of the water is found to be loosely bound. This water can, for drying purposes, be considered as free water at the surface. A comparison of the drying rates of sand, a material with mostly free water, with meat containing more bound water shows the effect of the binding of water on drying rates. Drying rate curves for these are shown in Fig. 7.5.

 

FIG. 7.5 Drying-rate curves
FIG. 7.5 Drying rate curves


The behaviour in which the drying behaves as though the water were at a free surface, is called constant-rate drying. If w is the mass of the material being dried then for constant rate drying:

dw/dt = constant.

However in food, unlike impervious materials such as sand, after a period of drying at a constant rate it is found that the water then comes off more slowly. A complete drying curve for fish, adapted from Jason (1958), is shown in Fig. 7.6. The drying temperature was low and this accounts for the long drying time.

FIG. 7.6 Drying curve for fish
Figure 7.6 Drying curve for fish


A more generalized drying curve plotting the rate of drying as a percentage of the constant (critical) rate, against moisture content, is shown in Fig. 7.7.

FIG. 7.7 Generalized drying curve
Figure 7.7 Generalized drying curve


The change from constant drying rate to a slower rate occurs at different moisture contents for different foods. However, for many foods the change from constant drying rate occurs at a moisture content in equilibrium with air of 58-65% relative humidity, that is at aw = 0.58-0.65. The moisture content at which this change of rate occurs is known as the critical moisture content, Xc .

Another point of importance is that many foods such as potato do not show a true constant rate drying period. They do, however, often show quite a sharp break after a slowly and steadily declining drying rate period and the concept of constant rate is still a useful approximation.

The end of the constant rate period, when X = Xc at the break point of drying-rate curves, signifies that the water has ceased to behave as if it were at a free surface and that factors other than vapour-pressure differences are influencing the rate of drying. Thereafter the drying rate decreases and this is called the falling-rate period of drying. The rate-controlling factors in the falling-rate period are complex, depending upon diffusion through the food, and upon the changing energy-binding pattern of the water molecules. Very little theoretical information is available for drying of foods in this region and experimental drying curves are the only adequate guide to design.


Calculation of Constant Drying Rates

In the constant-rate period, the water is being evaporated from what is effectively a free water surface. The rate of removal of water can then be related to the rate of heat transfer, if there is no change in the temperature of the material and therefore all heat energy transferred to it must result in evaporation of water. The rate of removal of the water is also the rate of mass transfer, from the solid to the ambient air. These two - mass and heat transfer - must predict the same rate of drying for a given set of circumstances.

Considering mass transfer, which is fundamental to drying, the driving force is the difference of the partial water vapour pressure between the food and the air. The extent of this difference can be obtained, knowing the temperatures and the conditions, by reference to tables or the psychrometric chart. Alternatively, the driving force may be expressed in terms of humidity driving forces and the numerical values of the mass-transfer coefficients in this case are linked to the others through the partial pressure/humidity relationships such as eqns. (7.4) and (7.5).


EXAMPLE 7.13. Rate of evaporation on drying
The mass-transfer coefficient from a free water surface to an adjacent moving air stream has been found to be 0.015 kg m-2 s-1. Estimate the rate of evaporation from a surface of 1 m2 at a temperature of 28°C into an air stream with a dry-bulb temperature of 40°C and RH of 40% and the consequent necessary rate of supply of heat energy to effect this evaporation.

From charts, the humidity of saturated air at 40°C is 0.0495 kg kg-1.

Humidity of air at 40°C and 40%RH = 0.0495 x 0.4
                                                    = 0.0198 kg kg-1
                                                    = Ya

From charts, the humidity of saturated air at 28°C is 0.0244 kg kg-1 = Ys

Driving force                                  = (Ys - Ya )
                                                    = (0.0244 - 0.0198) kg kg-1
                                                    = 0.0046 kg kg-1
Rate of evaporation                        = k'gA(Ys - Ya)
                                                    = 0.015 x 1 x 0.0046
                                                    = 6.9 x 10-5 kg s-1

Latent heat of evaporation of water at 28°C = 2.44 x 103 kJ kg-1

Heat energy supply rate per square metre = 6.9 x 10-5 x 2.44 x 103 kJ s-1

                                                    = 0.168 kJ s-1
                                                    = 0.168 kW.

The problem in applying such apparently simple relationships to provide the essential rate information for drying, is in the prediction of the mass transfer coefficients. In the section on heat transfer, methods and correlations were given for the prediction of heat transfer coefficients. Such can be applied to the drying situation and the heat transfer rates used to estimate rates of moisture removal. The reverse can also be applied.


EXAMPLE 7.14. Heat transfer in air drying
Using the data from Example 7.13, estimate the heat transfer coefficient needed from the air stream to the water surface.

Heat-flow rate =                          q = 168 J s -1 from Example 7.13.
Temperature difference = dry-bulb temperature of air - wet-bulb temperature (at food surface)
                                                    = (40 - 28)
                                                    = 12°C = (Ta - Ts )
Since                                         q = hcA (Ta - Ts)
                                  from Eqn (7.1)
                                              168 = hc x 1 x 12
                                                hc = 14 J m-2 s-1 °C-1

Mass balances are also applicable, and can be used, in drying and related calculations.


EXAMPLE 7.15. Temperature and RH in air drying of carrots
In a low-temperature drying situation, air at 60°C and 10 % RH is being passed over a bed of diced carrots at the rate of 20 kg dry air per second. If the rate of evaporation of water from the carrots, measured by the rate of change of weight of the carrots, is 0.16 kg s-1 estimate the temperature and RH of the air leaving the dryer.

From the psychrometric chart
Humidity of air at 60°C and 10%RH
                                                    = 0.013 kg kg-1.
Humidity added to air in drying
                                                    = 0.16 kg/20 kg dry air
    
                                                = 0.008 kg kg-1
Humidity of air leaving dryer
    
                                                = 0.013 + 0.008
    
                                                = 0.021 kg kg-1

Following on the psychrometric chart the wet-bulb line from the entry point at 60°C and 10%RH up to the intersection of that line with a constant humidity line of 0.021 kg kg-1, the resulting temperature is 41°C and the RH 42%.

Because the equations for predicting heat-transfer coefficients, for situations commonly encountered, are extensive and much more widely available than mass-transfer coefficients, the heat-transfer rates can be used to estimate drying rates, through the Lewis ratio.
Remembering that (Le) = (hc/csk'g) = 1 for the air/water system,from Eqn (7.5)
(strictly speaking the Lewis number, which arises in gaseous diffusion theory, is (hc/k'gcp) but for air of the humidity encountered in ordinary practice cs
cp 1.02 kJ kg-1 °C-1), therefore numerically, if hc is in J m-2 s-1 °C -1, and k'g in kg m-2 s-1, k'g = hc/1000, the values of hc can be predicted using the standard relationships for heat-transfer coefficients which have been discussed in Chapter 4.


EXAMPLE 7.16. Lewis relationship in air drying
In Example 7.13 a value for k'g of 0.0150 kg m-2 s-1 was used. It was also found that the corresponding heat-transfer coefficient for this situation was 15 J m-2 s-1 °C-1 as calculated in Example 7.14. Does this agree with the expected value from the Lewis relationship (eqn. 7.5) for the air/water system?

hc = 15 J m-2 s-1 °C-1
    = 1000 x 0.0150
    = 1000 x k'g as the Lewis relationship predicts.

A convenient way to remember the inter-relationship is that the mass transfer coefficient from a free water surface into air expressed in g m-2 s-1 is numerically approximately equal to the heat-transfer coefficient from the air to the surface expressed in J m-2 s-1 °C-1.


Falling rate Drying

The highest rate of drying is normally the constant rate situation, then as drying proceeds the moisture content falls and the access of water from the interior of the food to the surface affects the rate and decreases it. The situation then is complex with moisture gradients controlling the observed drying rates. Actual rates can be measured, showing in the idealized case a constant rate continuing up to the critical moisture content and thereafter a declining rate as the food, on continued drying, approaches the equilibrium moisture content for the food. This is clearly shown by the drying curve of Fig. 7.7 and at low moisture contents the rates of drying become very low. The actual detail of such curves depends, of course, on the specific material and conditions of the drying process.


Calculation of Drying Times

Drying rates, once determined experimentally or predicted from theory, can then be used to calculate drying times so that drying equipment and operations can be designed. In the most general cases, the drying rates vary throughout the dryer with time as drying proceeds, and with the changing moisture content of the material. So the situation is complicated. However, in many cases a simplified approach can provide useful results. One simplification is to assume that the temperature and RH of the drying air are constant.

In this case, for the constant-rate period, the time needed to remove the quantity of water which will reduce the food material to the critical moisture content Xc (that corresponding to the end of the constant-rate period and below which the drying rate falls) can be calculated by dividing this quantity of moisture by the rate.

So                t  =  w (Xo- Xc) / (dw /dt)const.                                                                (7.6)

where   (dw /dt )const. = k'gA(Ys -Ya)

and Xo is the initial moisture content and Xc the final moisture content (the critical moisture content in this case) both on a dry basis, w is the amount of dry material in the food and (dw/dt )const is the constant-drying rate.

Where the drying rate is reduced by a factor f then this can be incorporated to give:

                    Dt = w (DX)/ f(dw /dt)const.                                                                 (7.7)

and this has to be integrated piecemeal down to X = Xf where subscript f denotes the final water content, and f expresses the ratio of the actual drying rate to the maximum drying rate corresponding to the free surface-moisture situation.


EXAMPLE 7.17. Time for air drying at constant rate
100 kg of food material are dried from an initial water content of 80% on a wet basis and with a surface area of 12 m2. Estimate the time needed to dry to 50% moisture content on a wet basis, assuming constant-rate drying in air at a temperature of 120°C dry bulb and 50°C wet bulb.
Under the conditions in the dryer, measurements indicate the heat-transfer coefficient to the food surface from the air to be 18 J m-2 s-1 °C-1.

From the data

 Xo = 0.8/(1 - 0.8) = 4 kg kg-1,
Xf  = 0.5/(1 - 0.5)  = 1 kg kg-1,

and from the psychrometric chart, Ys = 0.087 and Ya = 0.054 kg kg-1

From the Lewis relationship (Eqn. 7.5) k'g = 18 g m-2 s-1 = 0.018 kg m-2
w  = 100(1 - 0.8) = 20 kg

Now we have    (dw /dt )const. = k'gA(Ys -Ya)
and so                               t  = w ( Xo - Xf) / [k'gA(Ys -Ya)]

(Using eqn. (7.3)
t   = 20(4 - 1)/[0.018 x 12 x (0.087 - 0.054)]
    = 60/7.128 x 10
    = 8417 s
    = 2.3 h (to remove 60 kg of water).

During the falling-rate period, the procedure outlined above can be extended, using the drying curve for the particular material and the conditions of the dryer. Sufficiently small differential quantities of moisture content to be removed have to be chosen, over which the drying rate is effectively constant, so as to give an accurate value of the total time. As the moisture content above the equilibrium level decreases so the drying rates decrease, and drying times become long.


EXAMPLE 7.18. Time for drying during falling rate
Continuing Example 7.17, for the particular food material, the critical moisture content, Xc, is 100% and the equilibrium moisture content under the conditions in the dryer is 15% and the drying curve is that illustrated in Fig. 7.7. Estimate the total time to dry down to 17%, all moisture contents being on a dry basis.

Equation (7.7)                     Dt    =    w ( DX) / [f(dw /dt)const]

can be applied, over small intervals of moisture content and multiplying the constant rate by the appropriate reduction factor (f) read of from Fig. 7.7. This can be set out in a table. Note the temperature and humidity of the air were assumed to be constant throughout the drying.

Moisture content X
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.18
0.17
w(X1 - X2)
2
2
2
0.4
0.2
f
0.86
0.57
0.29
0.11
0.005
1/f(dw/dt)const.
       = 1/ f(7.128 x 10-3)
1.63 x 102
2.46 x102
4.84 x 102
1.28 x 103
2.81 x 104
t
326
492
968
512
5620

St = 7918 s = 2.2 h (to remove 6.6 kg of water) = time at falling rate

Therefore total drying time = (2.3 + 2.2) h = 4.5 h.

The example shows how as the moisture level descends toward the equilibrium value so the drying rate becomes slower and slower. In terms of the mass transfer equations, the humidity or partial pressure driving force is tending to zero as the equilibrium moisture content is approached. In terms of the heat transfer equations, the surface temperature rises above the wet-bulb temperature once the surface ceases to behave as a wet surface. The surface temperature then climbs towards the dry-bulb temperature of the air as the moisture level continues to fall, thus leading to a continuously diminishing temperature driving force for surface heat transfer.

This calculation procedure can be applied to more complicated dryers, considering them divided into sections, and applying the drying rate equations and the input and output conditions to these sections sequentially to build up the whole situation in the dryer.


Drying > CONDUCTION DRYING


To top of pageBack to the top

Unit Operations in Food Processing. Copyright © 1983, R. L. Earle. :: Published by NZIFST (Inc.)
NZIFST - The New Zealand Institute of Food Science & Technology